A company computer and questions about e-mail privacy

When he was fired, Scott Sidell was angry enough. Then he found out that his former employer was reading his personal Yahoo e-mail messages, after he had left the company.

In a lawsuit that he filed in May against Structured Settlement Investments, the finance company he used to run, Sidell claims that executives at the company went so far as to read e-mail messages that he had sent to his lawyers discussing his strategy for winning an arbitration claim over his lost job.

"It's kind of like the other side gets your playbook, or they're spying on your locker room," said Russell Green, a lawyer representing Sidell. He said his client was now using a new e-mail address.

The lawsuit filed by Sidell in federal court in Connecticut involves an unsettled area of the law, where changes in technology create tension between expectations of personal privacy and companies' rights to monitor the equipment they provide to employees. The case's unusual combination of facts, which are in dispute, paves the way for a decision that could help set a precedent for dealing with personal e-mail at work.

The law governing e-mail communications is still evolving. Generally, courts have found that employers can monitor employees' e-mail communications on company computers. But courts have also recognized greater privacy protection for e-mail messages sent using personal, Web-based e-mail accounts. For example, this month, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in California ruled that personal text messages sent on two-way pagers provided to police officers in Ontario, Calif., were protected from the department.

Sidell's case gives the courts an opportunity to address other questions, said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. "This case raises a lot of new issues that reflect the changing place of e-mail in the workplace," Rotenberg said. "We have Web-based e-mail, which is not directly under the control of the employer."

In addition to concerns about privacy in the workplace, Sidell's claim involves communications between a lawyer and a client. "It's a nice set of factors that are all compacted into this," said Matt Zimmerman, senior staff attorney in the San Francisco office of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit civil-liberties organization that seeks to protect privacy rights online.

An employer's ability to read messages worries office workers everywhere, not least because e-mail messages have figured in criminal cases like the one brought last week against two former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers. People disclose all manner of personal information in e-mail messages, in the expectation--perhaps unfounded--that what they type will remain confidential.

Companies often adopt policies explicitly stating that everything an employee does on a computer provided by the employer is subject to monitoring. But even so, and especially in the absence of such a policy, employees may have a reasonable expectation of privacy, Zimmerman said.

Moreover, he said the expectation of privacy would be even higher, if employees used remotely hosted personal e-mail accounts like those provided by Yahoo. John Crossman, a lawyer at Zukerman Gore & Brandeis representing the company, said Structured Settlements had a policy that gave it the right to access its own computers. (Structured Settlement offers lump sums to people receiving installment payments--from personal-injury settlements or lottery winnings, for example.)

But Sidell was no longer an employee when his mail was supposedly read. And he said in his complaint that it went well beyond the company's rights to read e-mail messages from the personal account of a terminated employee to his lawyer.

"The plaintiff is alleging, and I think he may have a very strong argument, that his former employer exceeded (its) authority," Zimmerman said. "That is, he is accusing them of accessing his Yahoo account without authorization, in violation of federal law."

Another question is how it was possible to read Sidell's Yahoo e-mail messages. In his complaint, he said that when he returned to his office after he was fired, he may not have signed out of his Yahoo account. A feature of the account could have allowed anyone using his computer to access his e-mail messages for up to two weeks.

Rich Palma, the chief operating officer for Structured Settlement, outlined the company's position in a statement filed with the court. Palma said Sidell had returned to the office after he was fired and had begun using another employee's computer.

He said Sidell had used that computer without authorization and had sent trade secrets and confidential company information to his Yahoo e-mail account. Palma said the information included lists of customers, their home addresses and phone numbers, terms of deals, brokers who had sent business to the company, and personal information about the company's employees.

Crossman said the company could see what Sidell had done because Sidell's Yahoo e-mail account remained visible on the computer screen. "He did it in plain sight so that people in the office saw what he had done on the open, operating computer," he said.

That twist in the case, if true, may support the company's claim against Sidell for violating terms of his employment contract, which, among other things, prohibited him from competing against his employer for three years after leaving the company.

Of course, if the company learned of the contractual breach by improperly reading Sidell's personal e-mail, that could support his claim.

Crossman was careful in responding to that claim, saying, "It appears that the effort to assess the damage may have continued for several days, but the details of that are still being investigated."

The claims and counterclaims present "a very interesting fact pattern," said Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "It would make a great exam question."

Entire contents, Copyright © 2008 The New York Times. All rights reserved.

More from News.com on this story's topics

E-mail messages

RSS feed

Privacy

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Lawsuits

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Yahoo

Create an email alert | RSS feed
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 comments (Page 1 of 1)
by Penguinisto June 27, 2008 10:08 AM PDT
Email is not private. At all. Anyone with even the most cursory knowledge of SMTP will tell you that your email is perfectly legible at every end-point and SMTP relay server that passes the message along. Webmail only differs in that the HTTP transmissions are perfectly legible at the company proxy server instead of the company mail server. If you want any semblance of privacy in email (web or SMTP), your only hope is to encrypt them. Meanwhile, if you're sending email (or anything really) from (or through) company equipment, the company has the perfect right to read the contents, as it is their equipment you are using to do so. It does not matter if they can see the screen or not - your only hope is to use your own equipment. No offense, but Sidell is stupid for thinking that he has any expectation of privacy just because it's webmail. Use the company equipment, and the company can read it any time they want to.
Reply to this comment
by krosavcheg June 27, 2008 11:28 AM PDT
@ Penguinisto

Your missing the point - is it the expectation of reasonable privacy or being tech savvy enough to thwart it? (encryption, etc)

THAT is the question.
Reply to this comment View reply
by umbrae June 27, 2008 11:33 AM PDT
Email may not be private, but it is still not legal to read it without authorization. A letter is not private either. Anyone can go up to your mailbox and open the letter; however, it is a federal crime to do so. This guy may have been stupid for leaving an open connection to his mail server, but the employer broke the law by reading it. They should have logged him off the PC and respected his privacy as the law allows.

Just because I leave my wallet on my desk: the company does not have the right to go through it.
Reply to this comment View reply
by humanssssss June 27, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
Contract. I think when a person is an employee of a company, the person agrees that any work related using company's equipment may be monitored. The right to privacy ended when a person agrees to be monitored. Contractual agreement may at times supersede federal and state laws. This is becoming more and more relevant as more and more people are getting online throughout the world. There is no uniform laws to privacy and the expectation of privacy is relative to the contractual agreement between two voluntary exchange entities.

In some parts of the world, it is legal to sell your children for money. In some parts of the world, it is legal to sell your kidneys for money. In some parts of the world, it is legal to prostitute yourself for money as young as 10 years old. In some parts of the world, it is legal to own slave.

Most commenters are writing with respect to US laws. The Internet is not confined by US standards because people the in the US can afford buying beef to eat, most people in other part of the world, can't. Meaning, US standards are meaningless when the standard of living isn't right there with the US.
Reply to this comment
by humanssssss June 27, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
Following up with my comment above. The federal and state laws make exception for sexual discrimination for hire when it comes to Hooters case. In any trade, if appropriate, the trade in which money is made, can ask federal and state laws to be overruled from its absolute. This is ideal for growing an economy, otherwise laws will impinge upon growth, and society as a whole will decline. If history is any lesson, socialism/communism structure is an attempt to usurp the right of people to free market, which has been viewed as detriment to a growing economy. China, India, and Vietnam, three of the fastest growing economies understand this lesson well, and have renovate their countries to benefit from a free market.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Latest tech news headlines

Most Popular Stories
Google's search secret: It gets rid of you
Developer creates copy-paste tech for iPhone
Palm Treo Pro: Not digging it
Intel says it has 'first silicon' for next mobile chip
American Airlines launches in-flight Wi-Fi
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Yahoo (-0.31%) -0.06 19.11
Dow Jones Industrials (0.30%) 34.03 11,451.46
S&P 500 (0.38%) 4.79 1,279.33
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 1,816.15
CNET TECH (-0.06%) -0.90 1,629.90
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement
On CBS.com: A bride is murdered at her wedding
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites